Immigration judge

Karen W Schulz

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

67.2%

546 / 813

Total decisions

813

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

67.2%

Grants: 546

Denial rate

32.8%

Denials: 267

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Karen W. Schulz was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2021. Judge Schulz earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from University of California, Los Angeles, and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from Santa Clara University School of Law. From 2010 to 2021, she worked as a Private Practitioner, Managing Attorney, and Executive Director for Step Forward Foundation, in Morgan Hill, California. Judge Schulz is a member of the State Bar of California.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants546 / 813
Denials267 / 813
Other relief0 / 813

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Karen W Schulz.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

India

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

176

Grants

124

Denials

52

Grant rate: 70.5%Denial rate: 29.5%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

169

Grants

139

Denials

30

Grant rate: 82.2%Denial rate: 17.8%

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

131

Grants

88

Denials

43

Grant rate: 67.2%Denial rate: 32.8%

Mexico

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

91

Grants

45

Denials

46

Grant rate: 49.5%Denial rate: 50.5%

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

51

Grants

35

Denials

16

Grant rate: 68.6%Denial rate: 31.4%

Switzerland

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

38

Grants

27

Denials

11

Grant rate: 71.1%Denial rate: 28.9%

Nepal

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

26

Grants

18

Denials

8

Grant rate: 69.2%Denial rate: 30.8%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

14

Grants

4

Denials

10

Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%

Colombia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

13

Grants

0

Denials

13

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Russia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

13

Grants

11

Denials

2

Grant rate: 84.6%Denial rate: 15.4%

Afghanistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

8

Denials

1

Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%

Eritrea

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

8

Grants

6

Denials

2

Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%

Madagascar

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

2

Denials

4

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

Ukraine

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

4

Denials

2

Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%

Armenia

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

4

Denials

1

Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%

Peru

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

3

Denials

2

Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%

South Africa

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

0

Denials

5

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Venezuela

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

4

Grants

0

Denials

4

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Belize

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

3

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Cuba

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

1

Denials

2

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Victoria L. Argumedo

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
4.5%
Denial Rate
95.5%
View details

Samantha Begovich

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
16.8%
Denial Rate
83.2%
View details

Jeffrey J. Bernstein

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
8.8%
Denial Rate
91.2%
View details

Elisa C Brasil

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
88.3%
Denial Rate
11.7%
View details

Jeremy J Butler

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
69.0%
Denial Rate
31.0%
View details

Andrew J Caborn

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
24.3%
Denial Rate
75.7%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.