Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
75
Grants
62
Denials
13
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
29.6%
167 / 564
Total decisions
564
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.6%
Grants: 167
Denial rate
70.4%
Denials: 397
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Roger Frederick Sagerman was appointed as an immigration judge in September 2006. He received a bachelor of arts degree in 1988 from Tufts University and a juris doctorate in 1993 from the University of Buffalo. He also received a certificate in strategic intelligence in 2003 from the Joint Military Intelligence College. From July 1998 to September 2006, Judge Sagerman served in various positions at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in Washington, D.C., including Chief of the Enforcement Law Division, appellate counsel, and an associate general counsel. From April 1996 to June 1998, he served as an assistant district counsel for the INS in Napanoch and Fishkill, N.Y. Judge Sagerman is a member of the New York and Colorado bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Roger F Sagerman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cuba Sufficient sample | 75 | 62 | 13 | 82.7% | 17.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 60 | 10 | 50 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 56 | 6 | 50 | 10.7% | 89.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 54 | 5 | 49 | 9.3% | 90.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 34 | 8 | 26 | 23.5% | 76.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 33 | 2 | 31 | 6.1% | 93.9% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 86.4% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 18 | 13 | 5 | 72.2% | 27.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 16 | 13 | 3 | 81.3% | 18.8% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Guyana Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
75
Grants
62
Denials
13
Total decisions
60
Grants
10
Denials
50
Total decisions
56
Grants
6
Denials
50
Total decisions
54
Grants
5
Denials
49
Total decisions
34
Grants
8
Denials
26
Total decisions
33
Grants
2
Denials
31
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
22
Grants
3
Denials
19
Total decisions
20
Grants
15
Denials
5
Total decisions
18
Grants
13
Denials
5
Total decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
13
Denials
3
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.