Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
166
Grants
73
Denials
93
Grant rate: 44.0%Denial rate: 56.0%
Immigration judge
Shifra Rubin
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
62.7%
599 / 955
Total decisions
955
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
62.7%
Grants: 599
Denial rate
37.3%
Denials: 356
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Rubin to begin hearing cases in January 2016. Judge Rubin received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1992 from Rutgers University and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from Rutgers School of Law. From 2003 through 2015, Judge Rubin served in various capacities for the Immigration Representation Project, Legal Services of New Jersey, in Edison, N.J., including serving as a senior attorney, supervising attorney, and staff attorney. Judge Rubin is a member of the New Jersey Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants599 / 955
Denials356 / 955
Other relief0 / 955
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shifra Rubin.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 166 | 73 | 93 | 44.0% | 56.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 135 | 76 | 59 | 56.3% | 43.7% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 121 | 74 | 47 | 61.2% | 38.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 105 | 49 | 56 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 100 | 79 | 21 | 79.0% | 21.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 54 | 51 | 3 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 45 | 19 | 26 | 42.2% | 57.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 28 | 15 | 13 | 53.6% | 46.4% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 21 | 9 | 12 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 18 | 11 | 7 | 61.1% | 38.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 18 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 17 | 17 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
View details
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
135
Grants
76
Denials
59
Grant rate: 56.3%Denial rate: 43.7%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
121
Grants
74
Denials
47
Grant rate: 61.2%Denial rate: 38.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
105
Grants
49
Denials
56
Grant rate: 46.7%Denial rate: 53.3%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
100
Grants
79
Denials
21
Grant rate: 79.0%Denial rate: 21.0%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
54
Grants
51
Denials
3
Grant rate: 94.4%Denial rate: 5.6%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
19
Denials
26
Grant rate: 42.2%Denial rate: 57.8%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
15
Denials
13
Grant rate: 53.6%Denial rate: 46.4%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
9
Denials
12
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
11
Denials
7
Grant rate: 61.1%Denial rate: 38.9%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
18
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
17
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
Georgia
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.