Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
99
Grants
21
Denials
78
Grant rate: 21.2%Denial rate: 78.8%
Immigration judge
Danny Razo
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
19.4%
65 / 336
Total decisions
336
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
19.4%
Grants: 65
Denial rate
80.7%
Denials: 271
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Danny Razo was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Razo earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from the University of Texas at El Paso, and a Doctor of Jurisprudence in 2003 from Texas Tech University School of Law. From 2007 to 2022, he was in private practice in El Paso, Texas. From 2004 to 2007, he served as a staff attorney at a local nonprofit in El Paso. Judge Razo is a member of the State Bar of Arizona and State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants65 / 336
Denials271 / 336
Other relief0 / 336
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Danny Razo.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 99 | 21 | 78 | 21.2% | 78.8% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 47 | 7 | 40 | 14.9% | 85.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% | 82.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% | 65.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
St. Pierre & Miquelon Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Bahrain Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
7
Denials
40
Grant rate: 14.9%Denial rate: 85.1%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
0
Denials
41
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
5
Denials
24
Grant rate: 17.2%Denial rate: 82.8%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
7
Denials
13
Grant rate: 35.0%Denial rate: 65.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
St. Pierre & Miquelon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Bahrain
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Judith F Bonilla
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.9%
- Denial Rate
- 64.1%
Jaime Diaz
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.1%
- Denial Rate
- 76.9%
Nathan L. Herbert
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 17.3%
- Denial Rate
- 82.7%
Shannon R. Holderfield
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Enrique A Holguin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 7.8%
- Denial Rate
- 92.2%
Robert S. Hough
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.0%
- Denial Rate
- 85.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.