Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
100
Grants
48
Denials
52
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
35.9%
117 / 326
Total decisions
326
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.9%
Grants: 117
Denial rate
64.1%
Denials: 209
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Judith F. Bonilla as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Bonilla earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from St. Mary’s University and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from the University of Chicago Law School. From 2011 to 2020, she served asan assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in El Paso,Texas. From 2004 to 2009, she was an associate attorney with Holland & Knight LLP, in the District of Columbia. Judge Bonilla is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Judith F Bonilla.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 100 | 48 | 52 | 48.0% | 52.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 35 | 1 | 34 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 33 | 11 | 22 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Sufficient sample | 31 | 27 | 4 | 87.1% | 12.9% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 20 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bahrain Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
100
Grants
48
Denials
52
Total decisions
35
Grants
1
Denials
34
Total decisions
33
Grants
11
Denials
22
Total decisions
31
Grants
27
Denials
4
Total decisions
30
Grants
6
Denials
24
Total decisions
20
Grants
1
Denials
19
Total decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.