Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
309
Grants
45
Denials
264
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
25.2%
412 / 1634
Total decisions
1634
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
25.2%
Grants: 412
Denial rate
74.8%
Denials: 1222
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Jason L. Pope to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Pope earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from Niagara University and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from Syracuse University College of Law. From 2014 to 2019, he served as an assistantchief counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Departmentof Homeland Security, in Baltimore, Maryland. From 2007 to 2012, he was an associate attorneyspecializing in immigration law at the law firm of Berlin & Associates, P.A. in Baltimore,Maryland, and later founded the Law Office of Jason Pope in Frederick, Maryland. Judge Pope isa member of the Maryland State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jason L Pope.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 309 | 45 | 264 | 14.6% | 85.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 279 | 59 | 220 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 203 | 63 | 140 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 195 | 25 | 170 | 12.8% | 87.2% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 95 | 16 | 79 | 16.8% | 83.2% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 81 | 3 | 78 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 79 | 50 | 29 | 63.3% | 36.7% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 62 | 1 | 61 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 38 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 17 | 12 | 58.6% | 41.4% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 18 | 11 | 7 | 61.1% | 38.9% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 17 | 12 | 5 | 70.6% | 29.4% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Ghana Moderate sample | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details |
Total decisions
309
Grants
45
Denials
264
Total decisions
279
Grants
59
Denials
220
Total decisions
203
Grants
63
Denials
140
Total decisions
195
Grants
25
Denials
170
Total decisions
95
Grants
16
Denials
79
Total decisions
81
Grants
3
Denials
78
Total decisions
79
Grants
50
Denials
29
Total decisions
62
Grants
1
Denials
61
Total decisions
38
Grants
11
Denials
27
Total decisions
29
Grants
17
Denials
12
Total decisions
18
Grants
11
Denials
7
Total decisions
17
Grants
12
Denials
5
Total decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
9
Denials
7
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.