Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
120
Grants
11
Denials
109
Grant rate: 9.2%Denial rate: 90.8%
Immigration judge
Chase Calder Cleveland
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
11.2%
66 / 588
Total decisions
588
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
11.2%
Grants: 66
Denial rate
88.8%
Denials: 522
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Chase Calder Cleveland was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2024. Judge Cleveland earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from the University of Tennessee and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from the Texas Tech University School of Law. From 2023 to 2024, he served as a supervisory appellate attorney for the U.S. Army Government Appellate Division. From 2011 to 2023, he served as a prosecutor in the U.S. Army in the following locations: the U.S. Military Academy, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland; Fort Cavazos, Texas; and the Military District of Washington, D.C. From 2019 to 2021, he served as a judge advocate with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, New York. From 2015 to 2017, he served as a trial defense counsel at Fort Bliss, Texas. From 2010 to 2011, he served as an administrative law attorney at the U.S. Military Academy. From 2012 to 2013 and 2020 to 2021, he deployed to Bagram, Afghanistan, as the officer in charge of the detainee review boards with Task Force 435 and as a brigade judge advocate with the 10th Mountain Division. Judge Cleveland is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants66 / 588
Denials522 / 588
Other relief0 / 588
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Chase Calder Cleveland.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 120 | 11 | 109 | 9.2% | 90.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 107 | 5 | 102 | 4.7% | 95.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 100 | 3 | 97 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 72 | 4 | 68 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 38 | 9 | 29 | 23.7% | 76.3% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 32 | 7 | 25 | 21.9% | 78.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 24 | 3 | 21 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 20 | 2 | 18 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
107
Grants
5
Denials
102
Grant rate: 4.7%Denial rate: 95.3%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
100
Grants
3
Denials
97
Grant rate: 3.0%Denial rate: 97.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
4
Denials
68
Grant rate: 5.6%Denial rate: 94.4%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
9
Denials
29
Grant rate: 23.7%Denial rate: 76.3%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
7
Denials
25
Grant rate: 21.9%Denial rate: 78.1%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
3
Denials
21
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
2
Denials
18
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
St. Barthélemy
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Ghana
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Côte d’Ivoire
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Stephen Alcorn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
Erin Alexander
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 55.8%
- Denial Rate
- 44.2%
Lucy Baez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.5%
- Denial Rate
- 77.5%
Illya-Karina J Bonet
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.3%
- Denial Rate
- 77.7%
Lisa De Cardona
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 47.6%
- Denial Rate
- 44.4%
Michael P Davis
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 36.0%
- Denial Rate
- 64.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.