Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
75
Grants
7
Denials
68
Grant rate: 9.3%Denial rate: 90.7%
Immigration judge
Laura N Pierro
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
27.7%
163 / 588
Total decisions
588
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.7%
Grants: 163
Denial rate
72.3%
Denials: 425
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Laura N. Pierro to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Pierro earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1994 from the University of North Carolina,Chapel Hill, and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from Wake Forest University School of Law. In 2018,she served as the deputy executive assistant prosecutor in charge of litigation for the Ocean County Prosecutor’s Office (OCPO), in Toms River, New Jersey. From 2013 to 2018, she servedas the chief trial attorney for OCPO, in Toms River, New Jersey. From 2012 to 2013, she servedas a senior assistant prosecutor and trial team leader for the Presiding Criminal Judge of OCPO.From 2007 to 2013, she was the director of the Special Victims’ Unit at OCPO. From 1999 to 2007, she served OCPO as an assistant prosecutor in the Grand Jury, Juvenile and Trial Sections.From 1997 to 1998, she served as a law clerk to three criminal judges of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth Vicinage and the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office. Judge Pierro isa member of the District of Columbia Bar and New Jersey State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants163 / 588
Denials425 / 588
Other relief0 / 588
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Laura N Pierro.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 75 | 7 | 68 | 9.3% | 90.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 70 | 7 | 63 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 61 | 1 | 60 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 59 | 7 | 52 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 54 | 8 | 46 | 14.8% | 85.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 50 | 36 | 14 | 72.0% | 28.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 37 | 12 | 25 | 32.4% | 67.6% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 30 | 22 | 8 | 73.3% | 26.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
7
Denials
63
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
61
Grants
1
Denials
60
Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
59
Grants
7
Denials
52
Grant rate: 11.9%Denial rate: 88.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
54
Grants
8
Denials
46
Grant rate: 14.8%Denial rate: 85.2%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
36
Denials
14
Grant rate: 72.0%Denial rate: 28.0%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
12
Denials
25
Grant rate: 32.4%Denial rate: 67.6%
Nicaragua
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
22
Denials
8
Grant rate: 73.3%Denial rate: 26.7%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
6
Denials
15
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Bolivia
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Venezuela
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Grant rate: 85.7%Denial rate: 14.3%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Nepal
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Ukraine
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Albania
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Pakistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.