India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
185
Grants
85
Denials
100
Grant rate: 45.9%Denial rate: 54.1%
Immigration judge
Curtis F Pierce
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
34.4%
369 / 1072
Total decisions
1072
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
Grants: 369
Denial rate
65.6%
Denials: 703
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Curtis Pierce was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in May 2022. Judge Pierce earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1980 from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Juris Doctor in 1984 from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. From 1995 to 2022, he practiced immigration law with the Law Offices of Curtis Pierce in Los Angeles. Judge Pierce is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants369 / 1072
Denials703 / 1072
Other relief0 / 1072
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Curtis F Pierce.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 185 | 85 | 100 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 174 | 66 | 108 | 37.9% | 62.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 128 | 49 | 79 | 38.3% | 61.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 112 | 52 | 60 | 46.4% | 53.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 87 | 6 | 81 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 72 | 1 | 71 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 66 | 33 | 33 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 49 | 17 | 32 | 34.7% | 65.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 43 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 79.1% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
174
Grants
66
Denials
108
Grant rate: 37.9%Denial rate: 62.1%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
128
Grants
49
Denials
79
Grant rate: 38.3%Denial rate: 61.7%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
112
Grants
52
Denials
60
Grant rate: 46.4%Denial rate: 53.6%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
87
Grants
6
Denials
81
Grant rate: 6.9%Denial rate: 93.1%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
1
Denials
71
Grant rate: 1.4%Denial rate: 98.6%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
33
Denials
33
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
17
Denials
32
Grant rate: 34.7%Denial rate: 65.3%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
9
Denials
34
Grant rate: 20.9%Denial rate: 79.1%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Grant rate: 3.2%Denial rate: 96.8%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Iran
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Indonesia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Kyrgyzstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Janette L Allen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.6%
- Denial Rate
- 57.4%
Dale E. Anderson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.6%
- Denial Rate
- 97.4%
Peter L. Ashman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Joyce Bakke Varzandeh
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 42.2%
- Denial Rate
- 57.8%
Ira Bank
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 28.0%
- Denial Rate
- 72.0%
Lori R. Bass
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 40.4%
- Denial Rate
- 59.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.