Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
109
Grants
8
Denials
101
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
37.4%
204 / 546
Total decisions
546
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
37.4%
Grants: 204
Denial rate
62.6%
Denials: 342
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Jeannette L. Park to begin hearing cases in June 2016. Judge Park earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1996 from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from the Boston College Law School. From 2003 to May 2016, Judge Park served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security. From 2000 through 2003, Judge Park served as an assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice. Judge Park is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jeannette Lim Park.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 109 | 8 | 101 | 7.3% | 92.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 89 | 15 | 74 | 16.9% | 83.1% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 76 | 61 | 15 | 80.3% | 19.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 71 | 11 | 60 | 15.5% | 84.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 35 | 25 | 10 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 33 | 17 | 16 | 51.5% | 48.5% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 86.4% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% | 6.7% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Madagascar Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
109
Grants
8
Denials
101
Total decisions
89
Grants
15
Denials
74
Total decisions
76
Grants
61
Denials
15
Total decisions
71
Grants
11
Denials
60
Total decisions
35
Grants
25
Denials
10
Total decisions
33
Grants
17
Denials
16
Total decisions
22
Grants
3
Denials
19
Total decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Total decisions
15
Grants
14
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.