Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
136
Grants
13
Denials
123
Grant rate: 9.6%Denial rate: 90.4%
Immigration judge
George Pappas
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
33.5%
121 / 361
Total decisions
361
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
33.5%
Grants: 121
Denial rate
66.5%
Denials: 240
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
George D. Pappas was appointed as an immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Pappas earned a Bachelor of Science in 1982 from the London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, a Bachelor of Laws in 1998 from the University of London), a Master of Laws in 2000 from Widener University School of Law, Widener University, and a Doctor of Philosophy in 2014 from Birkbeck School of Law, University of London. From 2003 to 2023, he was principal attorney at George D. Pappas Esq. PC, practicing immigration, family law, criminal law, and civil litigation. He also provided pro bono legal services to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (Washington, D.C.), Pair Project (Boston), Latin American Coalition (Charlotte, North Carolina), El Centro (Hendersonville, North Carolina), and True Ridge (Hendersonville, North Carolina). Judge Pappas is a member of the North Carolina State Bar and the Massachusetts Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants121 / 361
Denials240 / 361
Other relief0 / 361
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to George Pappas.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 136 | 13 | 123 | 9.6% | 90.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 72 | 40 | 32 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 25 | 11 | 14 | 44.0% | 56.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 19 | 13 | 6 | 68.4% | 31.6% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 19 | 10 | 9 | 52.6% | 47.4% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Moderate sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
South Africa Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
40
Denials
32
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
11
Denials
14
Grant rate: 44.0%Denial rate: 56.0%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
10
Denials
14
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
Angola
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
13
Denials
6
Grant rate: 68.4%Denial rate: 31.6%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
10
Denials
9
Grant rate: 52.6%Denial rate: 47.4%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Grant rate: 46.2%Denial rate: 53.8%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Belarus
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Central African Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Rwanda
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
South Africa
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Sameer Ahmed
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 83.7%
- Denial Rate
- 16.3%
Jenny Beverly
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 57.9%
- Denial Rate
- 42.1%
Yul-Mi Cho
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 15.4%
- Denial Rate
- 84.6%
Kerry Doyle
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Luciana Dubuc
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 2.9%
- Denial Rate
- 97.1%
Nina Froes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 36.5%
- Denial Rate
- 63.5%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.