Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
87
Grants
11
Denials
76
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
15.4%
69 / 448
Total decisions
448
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
15.4%
Grants: 69
Denial rate
84.6%
Denials: 379
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Yul-mi Cho was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Cho earned a combined Bachelor of Arts/Master of Arts in 2001 from Boston University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from Roger Williams University School of Law. From 2018 to 2023, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Boston. From 2010 to 2018, she served as an assistant district attorney with the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office in Fall River, Massachusetts. Judge Cho is a member of the Connecticut Bar, the Massachusetts Bar, and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Yul-Mi Cho.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 87 | 11 | 76 | 12.6% | 87.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Sufficient sample | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31.3% | 68.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% | 91.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Portugal Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
87
Grants
11
Denials
76
Total decisions
58
Grants
0
Denials
58
Total decisions
32
Grants
10
Denials
22
Total decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
23
Grants
2
Denials
21
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.