Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
141
Grants
60
Denials
81
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
40.0%
207 / 518
Total decisions
518
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
40.0%
Grants: 207
Denial rate
60.0%
Denials: 311
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Kristie-Anne Padron was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Padron earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from Harvard University and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the Boston University School of Law. From 2017 to 2022, she was a Managing Attorney, from 2016 to 2017, a Supervising Attorney, and from 2014 to 2016, a Staff Attorney, all at Catholic Legal Services, in Miami. From 2012 to 2014, she was an Associate Attorney with Rivero Mestre LLP, in Coral Gables, Florida. From 2011 to 2012, she served as a Judicial Law Clerk for the Superior Court of Connecticut in New Haven, Connecticut. Judge Padron is a member of the Florida Bar and Massachusetts Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Kristie A Padron.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 141 | 60 | 81 | 42.6% | 57.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 93 | 33 | 60 | 35.5% | 64.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 82 | 36 | 46 | 43.9% | 56.1% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 50 | 10 | 40 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 29 | 13 | 16 | 44.8% | 55.2% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% | 52.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 17 | 2 | 15 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 12 | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
141
Grants
60
Denials
81
Total decisions
93
Grants
33
Denials
60
Total decisions
82
Grants
36
Denials
46
Total decisions
50
Grants
10
Denials
40
Total decisions
29
Grants
13
Denials
16
Total decisions
25
Grants
12
Denials
13
Total decisions
17
Grants
2
Denials
15
Total decisions
12
Grants
9
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.