Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
114
Grants
31
Denials
83
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
30.3%
71 / 234
Total decisions
234
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.3%
Grants: 71
Denial rate
69.7%
Denials: 163
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Donald R. Ostrom was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Ostrom earned a Bachelor of Science in 2000 from George Mason University, a Juris Doctor in 2003 from Capital University Law School, and a Master of Laws in Military Law in 2009 from the United States Army Judge Advocate General’s School. From 2003 to 2023, he served as a judge advocate in the U.S. Navy, which culminated in his service as the Circuit Trial Judge, Navy and Marine Corps Trial Judiciary in Norfolk, Virginia. From 1990 to 1995, Judge Ostrom served in the U.S. Marine Corps. Judge Ostrom is a member of the Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Donald Ostrom.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 114 | 31 | 83 | 27.2% | 72.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43.5% | 56.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cape Verde Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Chad Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guadeloupe Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
114
Grants
31
Denials
83
Total decisions
23
Grants
10
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.