Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
307
Grants
144
Denials
163
Grant rate: 46.9%Denial rate: 53.1%
Immigration judge
Rifian S Newaz
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
27.9%
361 / 1294
Total decisions
1294
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.9%
Grants: 361
Denial rate
72.1%
Denials: 933
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Rifian S. Newaz to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Newaz earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2001 from Rice University and a Juris Doctor in 2004from the University of Texas School of Law. From 2018 to 2019, he was of counsel for the lawfirm of Davis & Santos. From 2011 to 2018, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas, Department of Justice, in El Paso, Texas. From 2004 to 2010, heserved as an assistant district attorney for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office in Houston, Texas. Judge Newaz is a member of the Texas State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants361 / 1294
Denials933 / 1294
Other relief0 / 1294
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Rifian S Newaz.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 307 | 144 | 163 | 46.9% | 53.1% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 255 | 59 | 196 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 170 | 3 | 167 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 104 | 27 | 77 | 26.0% | 74.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 84 | 1 | 83 | 1.2% | 98.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 55 | 7 | 48 | 12.7% | 87.3% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 50 | 36 | 14 | 72.0% | 28.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 48 | 3 | 45 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 46 | 3 | 43 | 6.5% | 93.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 22 | 17 | 5 | 77.3% | 22.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 19 | 16 | 3 | 84.2% | 15.8% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Central African Republic Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
View details
Cuba
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
255
Grants
59
Denials
196
Grant rate: 23.1%Denial rate: 76.9%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
170
Grants
3
Denials
167
Grant rate: 1.8%Denial rate: 98.2%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
27
Denials
77
Grant rate: 26.0%Denial rate: 74.0%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
84
Grants
1
Denials
83
Grant rate: 1.2%Denial rate: 98.8%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
7
Denials
48
Grant rate: 12.7%Denial rate: 87.3%
Nepal
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
36
Denials
14
Grant rate: 72.0%Denial rate: 28.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
3
Denials
45
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
3
Denials
43
Grant rate: 6.5%Denial rate: 93.5%
Cameroon
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
17
Denials
5
Grant rate: 77.3%Denial rate: 22.7%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
16
Denials
3
Grant rate: 84.2%Denial rate: 15.8%
Eritrea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Grant rate: 53.8%Denial rate: 46.2%
Central African Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Grant rate: 58.3%Denial rate: 41.7%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Romania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
Sri Lanka
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Justin Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.7%
- Denial Rate
- 87.3%
Arvid C. Boyes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.7%
- Denial Rate
- 76.3%
Richard F. Brodsky
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.8%
- Denial Rate
- 75.2%
Margaret D Burkhart
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 65.2%
- Denial Rate
- 34.8%
Thomas G. Jr Crossan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.1%
- Denial Rate
- 79.9%
Yvonne S. Gonzalez
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 38.6%
- Denial Rate
- 61.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.