ECUADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
131
Grants
13
Denials
118
Grant rate: 9.9%Denial rate: 90.1%
Immigration judge
Mullican, Leila Mcneill.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
30.3%
300 / 989
Total decisions
989
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
30.3%
Grants: 300
Denial rate
69.7%
Denials: 689
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants300 / 989
Denials689 / 989
Other relief0 / 989
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECUADOR Larger sample | 131 | 13 | 118 | 9.9% | 90.1% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 103 | 30 | 73 | 29.1% | 70.9% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 94 | 17 | 77 | 18.1% | 81.9% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Larger sample | 93 | 29 | 64 | 31.2% | 68.8% | View details | |
BRAZIL Larger sample | 88 | 10 | 78 | 11.4% | 88.6% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 75 | 15 | 60 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 72 | 13 | 59 | 18.1% | 81.9% | View details | |
NIGERIA Larger sample | 57 | 43 | 14 | 75.4% | 24.6% | View details | |
TURKIYE Larger sample | 44 | 35 | 9 | 79.5% | 20.5% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 32 | 15 | 17 | 46.9% | 53.1% | View details | |
MEXICO Medium sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Medium sample | 14 | 9 | 5 | 64.3% | 35.7% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Medium sample | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
CHINA Medium sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Medium sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
GHANA Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
UZBEKISTAN Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
HAITI Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
103
Grants
30
Denials
73
Grant rate: 29.1%Denial rate: 70.9%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
94
Grants
17
Denials
77
Grant rate: 18.1%Denial rate: 81.9%
COLOMBIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
93
Grants
29
Denials
64
Grant rate: 31.2%Denial rate: 68.8%
BRAZIL
Larger sampleTotal decisions
88
Grants
10
Denials
78
Grant rate: 11.4%Denial rate: 88.6%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
75
Grants
15
Denials
60
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
13
Denials
59
Grant rate: 18.1%Denial rate: 81.9%
NIGERIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
57
Grants
43
Denials
14
Grant rate: 75.4%Denial rate: 24.6%
TURKIYE
Larger sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
35
Denials
9
Grant rate: 79.5%Denial rate: 20.5%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
15
Denials
17
Grant rate: 46.9%Denial rate: 53.1%
MEXICO
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
VENEZUELA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
9
Denials
5
Grant rate: 64.3%Denial rate: 35.7%
BANGLADESH
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
8
Denials
4
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
CHINA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
GHANA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
NICARAGUA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
UZBEKISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
HAITI
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
RUSSIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.