Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
92
Grants
0
Denials
92
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
3.2%
15 / 463
Total decisions
463
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
3.2%
Grants: 15
Denial rate
96.8%
Denials: 448
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed John W. Mc Phail as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Mc Phail earned a Bachelor of Science in 1980 from the State University College at Buffalo, New York and a Juris Doctor in 1984 from the University of Tulsa. From 2016 to 2020,he served as an asylum officer and immigration officer, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Houston. From 1996 to 2016, he servedas an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DHS, in Houston. From 1985 to 1996, he served as anassistant district attorney, in Garfield and Atoka County, Oklahoma. Judge Mc Phail is a memberof the Oklahoma State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to John McPhail.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 92 | 0 | 92 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 62 | 2 | 60 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 48 | 1 | 47 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 47 | 4 | 43 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
92
Grants
0
Denials
92
Total decisions
62
Grants
2
Denials
60
Total decisions
48
Grants
0
Denials
48
Total decisions
48
Grants
1
Denials
47
Total decisions
47
Grants
4
Denials
43
Total decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Total decisions
24
Grants
0
Denials
24
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.