Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
0
Denials
33
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
18.1%
44 / 243
Total decisions
243
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.1%
Grants: 44
Denial rate
81.9%
Denials: 199
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Mark S. Evans to begin hearing cases in November 2018. Judge Evans earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1982 from the University of Texas at Arlington and a Juris Doctor in 1987 from the University of Houston Law Center. From 1997 to 2018, he served as an assistant chief counsel, senior attorney, and deputy chief counsel with the Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Houston. From 1996 to 1997, he served as assistant district attorney with the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office in Richmond, Texas. From 1994 to 1996, he was anattorney in private practice, in Houston. From 1991 to 1994, he was an attorney with Driscolland Lacey, in Houston. From 1987 to 1991, he served as an assistant district attorney with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, in Houston. Judge Evans is a member of the State Barof Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Mark S Evans.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 25 | 3 | 22 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 20 | 12 | 8 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
33
Grants
0
Denials
33
Total decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Total decisions
25
Grants
3
Denials
22
Total decisions
21
Grants
4
Denials
17
Total decisions
20
Grants
12
Denials
8
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.