India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
135
Grants
82
Denials
53
Grant rate: 60.7%Denial rate: 39.3%
Immigration judge
Loi L McCleskey
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
64.5%
275 / 426
Total decisions
426
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
64.5%
Grants: 275
Denial rate
35.5%
Denials: 151
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Loi L. Mc Cleskey was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in July 2021.Judge Mc Cleskey earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Capital University and a Juris Doctorin 1999 from Capital University Law School. From 2013 to 2021, she served as an Administrative Hearing Officer Supervisor; from 2011 to 2013, Senior Administrative Hearing Officer; and from 2003 to 2011, Administrative Hearing Officer for the State of Ohio in Columbus. From 2000 to 2003, she was in private practice in Columbus. Judge Mc Cleskey is amember of the Ohio State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants275 / 426
Denials151 / 426
Other relief0 / 426
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Loi L McCleskey.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 135 | 82 | 53 | 60.7% | 39.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 71 | 47 | 24 | 66.2% | 33.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 55 | 40 | 15 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 50 | 33 | 17 | 66.0% | 34.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 24 | 22 | 2 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 17 | 13 | 4 | 76.5% | 23.5% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
71
Grants
47
Denials
24
Grant rate: 66.2%Denial rate: 33.8%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
40
Denials
15
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
33
Denials
17
Grant rate: 66.0%Denial rate: 34.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
22
Denials
2
Grant rate: 91.7%Denial rate: 8.3%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
11
Denials
11
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
13
Denials
4
Grant rate: 76.5%Denial rate: 23.5%
Eritrea
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Azerbaijan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Niue
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Colombia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Kazakhstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Victoria L. Argumedo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Samantha Begovich
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.8%
- Denial Rate
- 83.2%
Jeffrey J. Bernstein
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.8%
- Denial Rate
- 91.2%
Elisa C Brasil
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 88.3%
- Denial Rate
- 11.7%
Jeremy J Butler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.0%
- Denial Rate
- 31.0%
Andrew J Caborn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.3%
- Denial Rate
- 75.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.