Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
6
Denials
43
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
15.0%
44 / 293
Total decisions
293
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
15.0%
Grants: 44
Denial rate
85.0%
Denials: 249
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Elizabeth Martinez to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Martinez earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from Texas A&MInternational University and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from Texas Tech University School of Law.From 2007 to 2018, she was a solo practitioner with the Law Office of Elizabeth Martinez,PLLC in Laredo, Texas. From 2003 to 2007, she served as an assistant Webb County Public Defender in Laredo, Texas. From 2001 to 2003, she served as a juvenile prosecutor with the Office of the Webb County Attorney in Laredo, Texas. Judge Martinez is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Elizabeth Martinez.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 49 | 6 | 43 | 12.2% | 87.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 35 | 3 | 32 | 8.6% | 91.4% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 33 | 2 | 31 | 6.1% | 93.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 23 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% | 78.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 20 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
49
Grants
6
Denials
43
Total decisions
35
Grants
3
Denials
32
Total decisions
33
Grants
2
Denials
31
Total decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Total decisions
23
Grants
5
Denials
18
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
20
Grants
4
Denials
16
Total decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.