India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
307
Grants
275
Denials
32
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
68.2%
1381 / 2024
Total decisions
2024
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
68.2%
Grants: 1381
Denial rate
31.8%
Denials: 643
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Anna C. Little to begin hearingcases in March 2019. Judge Little earned a Business Certificate in 1988 from Sophia University Tokyo Japan, a Bachelor of Arts in 1989 from Seton Hall University, and a Juris Doctor in 1992from Seton Hall University School of Law. From 1994 to 2018, she was a solo practitioner in Highlands, New Jersey. From 2008 to 2010, she served as mayor of Highlands. From 2006 to 2007, she served as freeholder, Monmouth County, New Jersey. Judge Little is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Anna C Little.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 307 | 275 | 32 | 89.6% | 10.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 297 | 252 | 45 | 84.8% | 15.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 187 | 133 | 54 | 71.1% | 28.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 154 | 50 | 104 | 32.5% | 67.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 144 | 121 | 23 | 84.0% | 16.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 135 | 82 | 53 | 60.7% | 39.3% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 92 | 65 | 27 | 70.7% | 29.3% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 87 | 60 | 27 | 69.0% | 31.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 74 | 43 | 31 | 58.1% | 41.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 67 | 13 | 54 | 19.4% | 80.6% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 52 | 29 | 23 | 55.8% | 44.2% | View details | |
Georgia Sufficient sample | 52 | 38 | 14 | 73.1% | 26.9% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 52 | 45 | 7 | 86.5% | 13.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 27 | 4 | 23 | 14.8% | 85.2% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 27 | 7 | 20 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 18 | 9 | 9 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
307
Grants
275
Denials
32
Total decisions
297
Grants
252
Denials
45
Total decisions
187
Grants
133
Denials
54
Total decisions
154
Grants
50
Denials
104
Total decisions
144
Grants
121
Denials
23
Total decisions
135
Grants
82
Denials
53
Total decisions
92
Grants
65
Denials
27
Total decisions
87
Grants
60
Denials
27
Total decisions
74
Grants
43
Denials
31
Total decisions
67
Grants
13
Denials
54
Total decisions
52
Grants
29
Denials
23
Total decisions
52
Grants
38
Denials
14
Total decisions
52
Grants
45
Denials
7
Total decisions
27
Grants
4
Denials
23
Total decisions
27
Grants
7
Denials
20
Total decisions
21
Grants
7
Denials
14
Total decisions
18
Grants
9
Denials
9
Total decisions
16
Grants
16
Denials
0
Total decisions
14
Grants
5
Denials
9
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.