India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
248
Grants
234
Denials
14
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
95.0%
1146 / 1206
Total decisions
1206
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
95.0%
Grants: 1146
Denial rate
5.0%
Denials: 60
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Shira M. Levine was appointed an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2021.Judge Levine earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from the University of Michigan and a Juris Doctorate in 2012 from Stanford Law School. From 2019 to 2021, she worked as Staff Attorneyat Immigration Institute of the Bay Area, in Oakland, California. From 2015 to 2018, she workedas Staff Attorney at Centro Legal de la Raza, in Oakland. From 2013 to 2014, she was a Stanford Public Interest Law Fellow with Legal Aid at Work, in San Francisco. From 2012 to 2013, sheclerked for the Honorable Harry Pregerson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judge Levine is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shira M Levine.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 248 | 234 | 14 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 239 | 237 | 2 | 99.2% | 0.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 214 | 203 | 11 | 94.9% | 5.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 159 | 153 | 6 | 96.2% | 3.8% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 77 | 74 | 3 | 96.1% | 3.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 45 | 39 | 6 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 41 | 38 | 3 | 92.7% | 7.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 27 | 27 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 25 | 23 | 2 | 92.0% | 8.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 19 | 18 | 1 | 94.7% | 5.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 11 | 2 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 13 | 11 | 2 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Madagascar Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
248
Grants
234
Denials
14
Total decisions
239
Grants
237
Denials
2
Total decisions
214
Grants
203
Denials
11
Total decisions
159
Grants
153
Denials
6
Total decisions
77
Grants
74
Denials
3
Total decisions
45
Grants
39
Denials
6
Total decisions
41
Grants
38
Denials
3
Total decisions
27
Grants
27
Denials
0
Total decisions
25
Grants
23
Denials
2
Total decisions
19
Grants
18
Denials
1
Total decisions
13
Grants
11
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
11
Denials
2
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.