Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
393
Grants
16
Denials
377
Grant rate: 4.1%Denial rate: 95.9%
Immigration judge
Nicole Lane
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
8.3%
110 / 1334
Total decisions
1334
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
8.3%
Grants: 110
Denial rate
91.8%
Denials: 1224
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Nicole A. Lane was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2022. Judge Lane earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from the George Washington University Law School. From 2018 to 2022, she served as an assistant director at the New York State Adjudication Services Office. From 2012 to 2018, she served as a senior Administrative Law Judge, and from 2008 to 2012, she served as an Administrative Law Judge at the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. From 2005 to 2008, she was a director of public affairs at New York City Health and Hospitals in Harlem, New York, and worked as a public policy analyst prior to that. Judge Lane is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and New York State Bar, and is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants110 / 1334
Denials1224 / 1334
Other relief0 / 1334
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Nicole Lane.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 393 | 16 | 377 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 319 | 37 | 282 | 11.6% | 88.4% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 217 | 9 | 208 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 75 | 5 | 70 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 65 | 2 | 63 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 44 | 3 | 41 | 6.8% | 93.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 25 | 16 | 9 | 64.0% | 36.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
319
Grants
37
Denials
282
Grant rate: 11.6%Denial rate: 88.4%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
217
Grants
9
Denials
208
Grant rate: 4.1%Denial rate: 95.9%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
75
Grants
5
Denials
70
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
65
Grants
2
Denials
63
Grant rate: 3.1%Denial rate: 96.9%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
3
Denials
41
Grant rate: 6.8%Denial rate: 93.2%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
16
Denials
9
Grant rate: 64.0%Denial rate: 36.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
6
Denials
15
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Dominican Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Dominican Republic
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria I Akalski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.3%
- Denial Rate
- 95.7%
Richard Bailey
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.8%
- Denial Rate
- 80.2%
Shana W Chen
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.5%
- Denial Rate
- 91.5%
David Cheng
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.9%
- Denial Rate
- 79.1%
Henry S. Dogin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.4%
- Denial Rate
- 68.6%
Leo A Finston
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.1%
- Denial Rate
- 60.9%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.