Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
88
Grants
14
Denials
74
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.4%
55 / 443
Total decisions
443
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.4%
Grants: 55
Denial rate
87.6%
Denials: 388
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Lakshmi Srinivasan Herman as an immigrationjudge in March 2020. Judge Herman earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from Pacific Universityand a Juris Doctor in 2000 from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. From 2008 to 2020,she served as an assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey, in Newark, New Jersey. From 2005 to 2008, she was a litigation associate with Dechert LLP, in New York. From 2000 to 2005, she was a litigation associate with Shearman & Sterling LLP, in New York. Judge Herman is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lakshmi Herman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 88 | 14 | 74 | 15.9% | 84.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 67 | 2 | 65 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 63 | 6 | 57 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 62 | 4 | 58 | 6.5% | 93.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 61 | 21 | 40 | 34.4% | 65.6% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 28 | 2 | 26 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bahrain Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Burkina Faso Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nigeria Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
88
Grants
14
Denials
74
Total decisions
67
Grants
2
Denials
65
Total decisions
63
Grants
6
Denials
57
Total decisions
62
Grants
4
Denials
58
Total decisions
61
Grants
21
Denials
40
Total decisions
28
Grants
2
Denials
26
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.