Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
145
Grants
0
Denials
145
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Immigration judge
Ravit R Halperin
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
12.4%
83 / 669
Total decisions
669
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.4%
Grants: 83
Denial rate
87.6%
Denials: 586
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Ravit R. Halperin as an Immigration Judge in December 2020. Judge Halperin earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1989 from the State University of New York in Stony Brook and a Juris Doctor in 1992 from the City University of New York Law School. From 2008 to 2020, she was in private practice as the founder of Immigration Law Offices of R. Rae Halperin, in Adelanto and Lancaster, California. From 2000 to 2008, sheserved as a staff attorney for ASK Law Group, in Sherman Oaks, California. Judge Halperin is amember of the Utah State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants83 / 669
Denials586 / 669
Other relief0 / 669
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ravit R Halperin.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 145 | 0 | 145 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 141 | 42 | 99 | 29.8% | 70.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 96 | 0 | 96 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 69 | 2 | 67 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 50 | 6 | 44 | 12.0% | 88.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 32 | 18 | 14 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
141
Grants
42
Denials
99
Grant rate: 29.8%Denial rate: 70.2%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
96
Grants
0
Denials
96
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
69
Grants
2
Denials
67
Grant rate: 2.9%Denial rate: 97.1%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
6
Denials
44
Grant rate: 12.0%Denial rate: 88.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
0
Denials
35
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
18
Denials
14
Grant rate: 56.3%Denial rate: 43.8%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
2
Denials
16
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Grant rate: 7.1%Denial rate: 92.9%
Brazil
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Armenia
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Azerbaijan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Kyrgyzstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ukraine
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Georgia
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ethiopia
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Vikram Badrinath
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 70.4%
- Denial Rate
- 29.6%
Jonathan W Hitesman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.6%
- Denial Rate
- 68.4%
Denise Hunter
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 78.0%
- Denial Rate
- 22.0%
Print Maggard
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 78.3%
- Denial Rate
- 21.7%
William David Neumeister
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 65.5%
- Denial Rate
- 34.5%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.