Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
79
Grants
19
Denials
60
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
47.3%
103 / 218
Total decisions
218
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
47.3%
Grants: 103
Denial rate
52.8%
Denials: 115
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Jonathan H. Hall was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Hall earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2004 from The University of Rhode Island, a Juris Doctor in 2011 from Suffolk University Law School, and a Master of Laws in 2013 from American University Washington College of Law. From 2021 to 2023, he served as an administrative law judge at the District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings. From 2016 to 2021, he served as assistant general counsel at the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia. From 2013 to 2016, he served as assistant attorney general at the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. Judge Hall is a member of the District of Columbia Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jonathan Hall.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 79 | 19 | 60 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 39 | 22 | 17 | 56.4% | 43.6% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 28 | 13 | 15 | 46.4% | 53.6% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 19 | 17 | 2 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Serbia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Rwanda Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Djibouti Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
79
Grants
19
Denials
60
Total decisions
39
Grants
22
Denials
17
Total decisions
28
Grants
13
Denials
15
Total decisions
19
Grants
17
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.