Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
3128
Grants
2713
Denials
415
Grant rate: 86.7%Denial rate: 13.3%
Immigration judge
Vivienne E Gordon-Uruakpa
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
83.0%
4537 / 5468
Total decisions
5468
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
83.0%
Grants: 4537
Denial rate
17.0%
Denials: 931
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Gordon-Uruakpa was appointed as an Immigration Judge in June 2002. She received an undergraduate degree from Fordham University in 1980 and a Juris Doctorate from Howard School of Law in 1984. Judge Gordon-Uruakpa served as an assistant district counsel with the former Immigration and Naturalization Service in New York from 1996 to June 2002. From 1987 to 1996, she served as a staff attorney and supervisor with the Legal Aid Society, criminal defense division, also in New York. Judge Gordon-Uruakpa worked as a staff attorney/Reginald Heber Smith Fellow with the Legal Services Corporation, Chemung County Neighborhood Legal Services in Elmira, New York, from 1984 to 1986. She is a member of the New York Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants4537 / 5468
Denials931 / 5468
Other relief0 / 5468
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Vivienne E Gordon-Uruakpa.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 3128 | 2713 | 415 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 229 | 194 | 35 | 84.7% | 15.3% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 162 | 152 | 10 | 93.8% | 6.2% | View details | |
Albania Sufficient sample | 138 | 118 | 20 | 85.5% | 14.5% | View details | |
Former Countries Sufficient sample | 127 | 122 | 5 | 96.1% | 3.9% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 126 | 105 | 21 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Guinea Sufficient sample | 121 | 93 | 28 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 102 | 46 | 56 | 45.1% | 54.9% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 80 | 50 | 30 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 70 | 66 | 4 | 94.3% | 5.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 66 | 25 | 41 | 37.9% | 62.1% | View details | |
Indonesia Sufficient sample | 66 | 52 | 14 | 78.8% | 21.2% | View details | |
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire) Sufficient sample | 63 | 47 | 16 | 74.6% | 25.4% | View details | |
Former Countries Sufficient sample | 61 | 45 | 16 | 73.8% | 26.2% | View details | |
Egypt Sufficient sample | 53 | 47 | 6 | 88.7% | 11.3% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Sufficient sample | 53 | 45 | 8 | 84.9% | 15.1% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 51 | 41 | 10 | 80.4% | 19.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 46 | 26 | 20 | 56.5% | 43.5% | View details | |
Mali Sufficient sample | 41 | 22 | 19 | 53.7% | 46.3% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 37 | 14 | 23 | 37.8% | 62.2% | View details |
View details
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
229
Grants
194
Denials
35
Grant rate: 84.7%Denial rate: 15.3%
Nepal
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
162
Grants
152
Denials
10
Grant rate: 93.8%Denial rate: 6.2%
Albania
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
138
Grants
118
Denials
20
Grant rate: 85.5%Denial rate: 14.5%
Former Countries
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
127
Grants
122
Denials
5
Grant rate: 96.1%Denial rate: 3.9%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
126
Grants
105
Denials
21
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Guinea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
121
Grants
93
Denials
28
Grant rate: 76.9%Denial rate: 23.1%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
46
Denials
56
Grant rate: 45.1%Denial rate: 54.9%
Pakistan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
50
Denials
30
Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
66
Denials
4
Grant rate: 94.3%Denial rate: 5.7%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
25
Denials
41
Grant rate: 37.9%Denial rate: 62.1%
Indonesia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
52
Denials
14
Grant rate: 78.8%Denial rate: 21.2%
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
63
Grants
47
Denials
16
Grant rate: 74.6%Denial rate: 25.4%
Former Countries
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
61
Grants
45
Denials
16
Grant rate: 73.8%Denial rate: 26.2%
Egypt
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
47
Denials
6
Grant rate: 88.7%Denial rate: 11.3%
Sri Lanka
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
45
Denials
8
Grant rate: 84.9%Denial rate: 15.1%
Mauritania
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
41
Denials
10
Grant rate: 80.4%Denial rate: 19.6%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
26
Denials
20
Grant rate: 56.5%Denial rate: 43.5%
Mali
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
22
Denials
19
Grant rate: 53.7%Denial rate: 46.3%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
14
Denials
23
Grant rate: 37.8%Denial rate: 62.2%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lori Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 79.5%
- Denial Rate
- 20.5%
Matthew T. Adrian
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.3%
- Denial Rate
- 48.7%
H. Jere Armstrong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Terry A. Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
Susan M Beschta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 81.3%
- Denial Rate
- 18.8%
Noel A Brennan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.