Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
14
Denials
22
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
11.1%
40 / 361
Total decisions
361
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
11.1%
Grants: 40
Denial rate
88.9%
Denials: 321
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Cynthia D. Goodman was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Goodman earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of North Texas and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from Texas Tech University School of Law. From 2016 to 2023, she served as a pro se staff attorney for the U.S. Court for the Northern District of Texas. From 2013 to 2016, she was a private practice immigration and criminal defense attorney with Stockard, Johnston, Brown LLC in Amarillo, Texas. From 2008 to 2013, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Dallas. During this time, from 2011 to 2013, Judge Goodman served a detail as a special assistant U.S. attorney for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Dallas. From 2006 to 2008, she served as an assistant county attorney for Potter County, Texas. Judge Goodman is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Cynthia Goodman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 36 | 14 | 22 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 28 | 1 | 27 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 23 | 3 | 20 | 13.0% | 87.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 22 | 1 | 21 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
Total decisions
36
Grants
14
Denials
22
Total decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Total decisions
28
Grants
1
Denials
27
Total decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Total decisions
23
Grants
3
Denials
20
Total decisions
22
Grants
1
Denials
21
Total decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
1
Denials
13
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
12
Grants
2
Denials
10
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.