Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
9.4%
22 / 235
Total decisions
235
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
9.4%
Grants: 22
Denial rate
90.6%
Denials: 213
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Sherron Ashworth as an immigration judge in March 2020. Judge Ashworth earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from Louisiana College and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from the Louisiana State University, Paul M. Hebert Law Center. From 2009 to 2020, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Oakdale, Louisiana. From 2006 to 2009, she served as an assistant district attorney,in Allen Parish, Louisiana. From 2005 to 2006, she was an associate attorney with Bolen, Parker& Brenner, in Alexandria, Louisiana. From 2004 to 2005, she served as a law clerk for the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Judge Ashworth is a member of the Louisiana State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Sherron Ashworth.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Total decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Total decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Total decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.