Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
89
Grants
62
Denials
27
Grant rate: 69.7%Denial rate: 30.3%
Immigration judge
Ayodele Gansallo
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
50.2%
210 / 418
Total decisions
418
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
50.2%
Grants: 210
Denial rate
49.8%
Denials: 208
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Ayodele A. Gansallo was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Gansallo earned a Bachelor of Laws in 1985 from Leicester University, England. From 1985 to 1986, she attended the Guildford College of Law, and completed the program for Solicitors. She earned a Master of Laws from Temple University Beasley School of Law in 1998. From 2021 to 2022, she was the Co-Director of Legal Services with the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society of Pennsylvania (HIAS PA), in Philadelphia. From 1998 to 2020, she was the Senior Staff Attorney with HIAS PA. From 1994 to 1997, she was the Legal Director and Policy Coordinator with The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants in London. From 1992 to 1994, she was the Solicitor with the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit in Manchester, England. From 1988 to 1989, she was a Solicitor with Michael Freeman and Co, in London. From 1987 to 1988, she was a trainee Solicitor with the London Borough of Islington, in London. Judge Gansallo is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants210 / 418
Denials208 / 418
Other relief0 / 418
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ayodele Gansallo.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 89 | 62 | 27 | 69.7% | 30.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 56 | 17 | 39 | 30.4% | 69.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 44 | 18 | 26 | 40.9% | 59.1% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 31 | 23 | 8 | 74.2% | 25.8% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 22 | 21 | 1 | 95.5% | 4.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% | 6.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
17
Denials
39
Grant rate: 30.4%Denial rate: 69.6%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
18
Denials
26
Grant rate: 40.9%Denial rate: 59.1%
Cameroon
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
23
Denials
8
Grant rate: 74.2%Denial rate: 25.8%
Brazil
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
2
Denials
25
Grant rate: 7.4%Denial rate: 92.6%
Ethiopia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
21
Denials
1
Grant rate: 95.5%Denial rate: 4.5%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
14
Denials
1
Grant rate: 93.3%Denial rate: 6.7%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Grant rate: 15.4%Denial rate: 84.6%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Grant rate: 53.8%Denial rate: 46.2%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
Mexico
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Peru
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Uzbekistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Kazakhstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Matthew Bohrer
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.6%
- Denial Rate
- 68.5%
Tanisha Bowens
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 44.6%
- Denial Rate
- 55.4%
Mark K Brooks
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 25.7%
- Denial Rate
- 74.3%
Michael J. Creppy
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 25.0%
- Denial Rate
- 75.0%
Claudia Cubas
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 73.4%
- Denial Rate
- 26.6%
Irma Diaz
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.4%
- Denial Rate
- 87.6%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.