Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
36
Denials
12
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
35.0%
99 / 283
Total decisions
283
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
35.0%
Grants: 99
Denial rate
65.0%
Denials: 184
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Ashley Gadson-Andrews was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2022. Judge Gadson-Andrews earned a Bachelor of Science in 2008 from the University of Arizona – Eller College of Management and a Juris Doctor in 2011 from the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. From 2013 to 2022, she served as a deputy district attorney at the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office. From 2012 to 2013, she was a trial attorney with the Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers at Edelman Children’s Court in Monterey Park, California. Judge Gadson-Andrews is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ashley Gadson-Andrews.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 48 | 36 | 12 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 25 | 20 | 5 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Moderate sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 19 | 2 | 17 | 10.5% | 89.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 18 | 1 | 17 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Indonesia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
48
Grants
36
Denials
12
Total decisions
25
Grants
20
Denials
5
Total decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Total decisions
21
Grants
4
Denials
17
Total decisions
19
Grants
2
Denials
17
Total decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Total decisions
18
Grants
1
Denials
17
Total decisions
18
Grants
2
Denials
16
Total decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Total decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.