Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
101
Grants
31
Denials
70
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
12.8%
101 / 791
Total decisions
791
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
12.8%
Grants: 101
Denial rate
87.2%
Denials: 690
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Daniel B. Conklin was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Conklin earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2003 from the University of Michigan and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from the University of Kansas School of Law. From 2014 to 2023, he practiced immigration law with The Shagin Law Group in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. From 2013 to 2014, he was a staff attorney for the Pennsylvania Immigration Resource Center in York, Pennsylvania. From 2010 to 2012, he served as a judicial law clerk and then an attorney advisor at the Kansas City Immigration Court, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Conklin is a member of the State Bar of Michigan.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Daniel B Conklin.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niue Sufficient sample | 101 | 31 | 70 | 30.7% | 69.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 92 | 6 | 86 | 6.5% | 93.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 80 | 33 | 47 | 41.3% | 58.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 59 | 0 | 59 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 49 | 1 | 48 | 2.0% | 98.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 26 | 5 | 21 | 19.2% | 80.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 20 | 10 | 10 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
101
Grants
31
Denials
70
Total decisions
92
Grants
6
Denials
86
Total decisions
80
Grants
0
Denials
80
Total decisions
80
Grants
33
Denials
47
Total decisions
68
Grants
0
Denials
68
Total decisions
59
Grants
0
Denials
59
Total decisions
49
Grants
1
Denials
48
Total decisions
41
Grants
0
Denials
41
Total decisions
32
Grants
0
Denials
32
Total decisions
26
Grants
5
Denials
21
Total decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Total decisions
20
Grants
10
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
5
Denials
9
Total decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.