Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
133
Grants
32
Denials
101
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
93 / 650
Total decisions
650
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.3%
Grants: 93
Denial rate
85.7%
Denials: 557
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Sarjo Barrow was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Barrow earned a Bachelor of Science in 2010 from John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, and a Juris Doctor in 2013 from Thomas M. Cooley Law School. From 2019 to 2024, he served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Baltimore from 2023 to 2024 and in San Francisco from 2019 to 2023. From 2013 to 2019, he was an attorney in private practice in Madison, Wisconsin, including two years as an immigration attorney. Judge Barrow is a member of the State Bar of Wisconsin.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Sarjo Barrow.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 133 | 32 | 101 | 24.1% | 75.9% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 108 | 15 | 93 | 13.9% | 86.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 81 | 0 | 81 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 58 | 4 | 54 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 56 | 4 | 52 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 44 | 3 | 41 | 6.8% | 93.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 43 | 17 | 26 | 39.5% | 60.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 29 | 2 | 27 | 6.9% | 93.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 29 | 4 | 25 | 13.8% | 86.2% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
Total decisions
133
Grants
32
Denials
101
Total decisions
108
Grants
15
Denials
93
Total decisions
81
Grants
0
Denials
81
Total decisions
58
Grants
4
Denials
54
Total decisions
56
Grants
4
Denials
52
Total decisions
44
Grants
3
Denials
41
Total decisions
43
Grants
17
Denials
26
Total decisions
29
Grants
2
Denials
27
Total decisions
29
Grants
4
Denials
25
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.