Eugene H. Robinson JR.
Court
Total Decisions
729
Asylum Grant Rate
43.5%
Denials
56.5%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
← All courtsactive active active active active active active
Immigration Court
Otm Immigration Court
Community discussion · 08 Judges indexed · CA
- State
- Immigration Court, CA
- Data Source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
30.0%
856 / 2855
Average Asylum Grant Rate
30.0%
Asylum grants
856
Denials
1999
Judges indexed
8
This page is based on public data currently organized by this site and may not represent complete real-time EOIR data.
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Otm Immigration Court.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Judges indexed for this court
Browse public data on U.S. immigration judges, including assigned court, asylum grant rate, denial rate, total decisions, and data sources.
active
Catherine E. Halliday-Roberts
Court
Total Decisions
509
Asylum Grant Rate
26.3%
Denials
73.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Ana Partida
Court
Total Decisions
479
Asylum Grant Rate
37.4%
Denials
62.6%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Mark Sameit
Court
Total Decisions
432
Asylum Grant Rate
30.8%
Denials
69.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Paula Dixon
Court
Total Decisions
145
Asylum Grant Rate
33.1%
Denials
66.9%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
John T. Driscoll
Court
Total Decisions
63
Asylum Grant Rate
34.9%
Denials
65.1%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Ferdinand J. Ortiz
Court
Total Decisions
60
Asylum Grant Rate
35.0%
Denials
65.0%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Leah Obrien
Court
Total Decisions
41
Asylum Grant Rate
9.8%
Denials
90.2%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
The sample size is relatively substantial, but it still cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Data updated: Aug 8, 2026
Asylum Grant Rate · Nationalities
| Nationalities | Asylum Grant Rate | Asylum grants | Denials | Total Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5.2% | 29 | 527 | 556 |
| Russia | 58.8% | 174 | 122 | 296 |
| Cameroon | 67.5% | 162 | 78 | 240 |
| Spain | 12.4% | 23 | 162 | 185 |
| Eritrea | 47.7% | 63 | 69 | 132 |
| Guatemala | 6.7% | 8 | 112 | 120 |
| Honduras | 17.1% | 19 | 92 | 111 |
| Switzerland | 32.6% | 28 | 58 | 86 |
| Iran | 46.1% | 35 | 41 | 76 |
| Colombia | 7.7% | 5 | 60 | 65 |
| Afghanistan | 45.0% | 27 | 33 | 60 |
| Georgia | 49.2% | 29 | 30 | 59 |
| India | 3.8% | 2 | 51 | 53 |
| Uzbekistan | 37.5% | 18 | 30 | 48 |
| Venezuela | 32.6% | 15 | 31 | 46 |
| Turkiye | 44.2% | 19 | 24 | 43 |
| Armenia | 33.3% | 14 | 28 | 42 |
| Niue | 45.9% | 17 | 20 | 37 |
| Kyrgyzstan | 50.0% | 18 | 18 | 36 |
| Somalia | 22.9% | 8 | 27 | 35 |
| Cuba | 35.3% | 12 | 22 | 34 |
| Jamaica | 12.5% | 4 | 28 | 32 |
| Ethiopia | 54.8% | 17 | 14 | 31 |
| Vietnam | 13.3% | 4 | 26 | 30 |
| Pakistan | 14.8% | 4 | 23 | 27 |
| Yemen | 34.8% | 8 | 15 | 23 |
| Nepal | 23.8% | 5 | 16 | 21 |
| Peru | 0.0% | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| Tristan da Cunha | 52.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| Haiti | 0.0% | 0 | 18 | 18 |
| Guinea | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Ukraine | 35.7% | 5 | 9 | 14 |
| Bulgaria | 15.4% | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Bahrain | 0.0% | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Ecuador | 15.4% | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Ghana | 38.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| Iraq | 36.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| Kazakhstan | 27.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Mauritania | 54.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Syria | 20.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Brazil | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Democratic Republic Of Congo | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Nicaragua | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Russia | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Azerbaijan | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Central African Republic | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Egypt | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Belize | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Jordan | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Singapore | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Tonga | 83.3% | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Dominican Republic | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Unknown Nationality | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Angola | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mali | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kosovo | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Macao SAR China | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Philippines | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Romania | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sierra Leone | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Stateless — person unable to name a country | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Argentina | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Brunei | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cocos (Keeling) Islands | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gabon | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Guinea Bissau | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Hong Kong SAR China | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Iceland | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kenya | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Rwanda | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Albania | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ascension Island | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Burundi | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Central African Republic | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Congo - Kinshasa | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Côte d’Ivoire | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Serbia | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Indonesia | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ireland | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Japan | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laos | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Malaysia | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martinique | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Moldova | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nigeria | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| South Africa | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tanzania | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tunisia | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chad | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Türkiye | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Uganda | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Data Source · Disclaimer
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.