Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
85
Grants
8
Denials
77
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
37.4%
179 / 479
Total decisions
479
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
37.4%
Grants: 179
Denial rate
62.6%
Denials: 300
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Ana L. Partida to begin hearing cases in June 2016. Judge Partida earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1996 from San Diego State University, a Master of Forensic Sciences degree in 1998 from National University, and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the New England School of Law. From 2003 to May 2016, Judge Partida served as an assistant chief counsel for the Office of the Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS). From 2002 through 2003, Judge Partida served as an assistant district counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice. Judge Partida is a member of the New Jersey State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ana Partida.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 85 | 8 | 77 | 9.4% | 90.6% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 74 | 29 | 45 | 39.2% | 60.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 49 | 22 | 27 | 44.9% | 55.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 43 | 3 | 40 | 7.0% | 93.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 31 | 22 | 9 | 71.0% | 29.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 28 | 16 | 12 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 17 | 10 | 7 | 58.8% | 41.2% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Moderate sample | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% | 81.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 13 | 11 | 2 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
85
Grants
8
Denials
77
Total decisions
74
Grants
29
Denials
45
Total decisions
49
Grants
22
Denials
27
Total decisions
43
Grants
3
Denials
40
Total decisions
31
Grants
22
Denials
9
Total decisions
28
Grants
16
Denials
12
Total decisions
17
Grants
10
Denials
7
Total decisions
16
Grants
3
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
11
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.