CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
313
Grants
73
Denials
240
Grant rate: 23.3%Denial rate: 76.7%
Immigration judge
Peterson, William C.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
25.1%
241 / 961
Total decisions
961
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
25.1%
Grants: 241
Denial rate
74.9%
Denials: 720
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants241 / 961
Denials720 / 961
Other relief0 / 961
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 313 | 73 | 240 | 23.3% | 76.7% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 78 | 8 | 70 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 66 | 2 | 64 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Larger sample | 39 | 12 | 27 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 38 | 6 | 32 | 15.8% | 84.2% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 36 | 4 | 32 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
CAMEROON Larger sample | 32 | 11 | 21 | 34.4% | 65.6% | View details | |
ERITREA Larger sample | 30 | 23 | 7 | 76.7% | 23.3% | View details | |
MEXICO Medium sample | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
ARMENIA Medium sample | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 18 | 12 | 6 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 17 | 14 | 3 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
INDONESIA Medium sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Medium sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
ALBANIA Medium sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Medium sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
SOMALIA Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
EGYPT Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
View details
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
78
Grants
8
Denials
70
Grant rate: 10.3%Denial rate: 89.7%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
66
Grants
2
Denials
64
Grant rate: 3.0%Denial rate: 97.0%
COLOMBIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
12
Denials
27
Grant rate: 30.8%Denial rate: 69.2%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
6
Denials
32
Grant rate: 15.8%Denial rate: 84.2%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
4
Denials
32
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
CAMEROON
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
11
Denials
21
Grant rate: 34.4%Denial rate: 65.6%
ERITREA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
23
Denials
7
Grant rate: 76.7%Denial rate: 23.3%
MEXICO
Medium sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
1
Denials
24
Grant rate: 4.0%Denial rate: 96.0%
ARMENIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
5
Denials
19
Grant rate: 20.8%Denial rate: 79.2%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
4
Denials
20
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
12
Denials
6
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
14
Denials
3
Grant rate: 82.4%Denial rate: 17.6%
INDONESIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
BANGLADESH
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
ALBANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
NICARAGUA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
RUSSIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
SOMALIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
EGYPT
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.