CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
465
Grants
413
Denials
52
Grant rate: 88.8%Denial rate: 11.2%
Immigration judge
Khan, Amiena A.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
79.2%
1002 / 1266
Total decisions
1266
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
79.2%
Grants: 1002
Denial rate
20.9%
Denials: 264
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants1002 / 1266
Denials264 / 1266
Other relief0 / 1266
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 465 | 413 | 52 | 88.8% | 11.2% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 104 | 90 | 14 | 86.5% | 13.5% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 62 | 40 | 22 | 64.5% | 35.5% | View details | |
NEPAL Larger sample | 61 | 52 | 9 | 85.2% | 14.8% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 60 | 48 | 12 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Larger sample | 55 | 50 | 5 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
EGYPT Larger sample | 40 | 32 | 8 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Larger sample | 33 | 31 | 2 | 93.9% | 6.1% | View details | |
ECUADOR Larger sample | 31 | 10 | 21 | 32.3% | 67.7% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Medium sample | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% | 67.9% | View details | |
BURKINA FASO Medium sample | 24 | 21 | 3 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 21 | 18 | 3 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
ALBANIA Medium sample | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
GUINEA Medium sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
UKRAINE Medium sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Medium sample | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69.2% | 30.8% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
NIGERIA Medium sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
BELARUS Medium sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details |
View details
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
90
Denials
14
Grant rate: 86.5%Denial rate: 13.5%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
40
Denials
22
Grant rate: 64.5%Denial rate: 35.5%
NEPAL
Larger sampleTotal decisions
61
Grants
52
Denials
9
Grant rate: 85.2%Denial rate: 14.8%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
60
Grants
48
Denials
12
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
BANGLADESH
Larger sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
50
Denials
5
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
EGYPT
Larger sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
32
Denials
8
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Former Countries
Larger sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
31
Denials
2
Grant rate: 93.9%Denial rate: 6.1%
ECUADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
10
Denials
21
Grant rate: 32.3%Denial rate: 67.7%
GUATEMALA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
9
Denials
19
Grant rate: 32.1%Denial rate: 67.9%
BURKINA FASO
Medium sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
21
Denials
3
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
18
Denials
3
Grant rate: 85.7%Denial rate: 14.3%
ALBANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
15
Denials
3
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
16
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
GUINEA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Grant rate: 61.5%Denial rate: 38.5%
UKRAINE
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Grant rate: 92.3%Denial rate: 7.7%
VENEZUELA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
9
Denials
4
Grant rate: 69.2%Denial rate: 30.8%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
NIGERIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
BELARUS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.0%Denial rate: 10.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.