CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
114
Grants
69
Denials
45
Grant rate: 60.5%Denial rate: 39.5%
Immigration judge
Del Bene, Charles A.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
36.2%
230 / 635
Total decisions
635
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.2%
Grants: 230
Denial rate
63.8%
Denials: 405
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants230 / 635
Denials405 / 635
Other relief0 / 635
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 114 | 69 | 45 | 60.5% | 39.5% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 84 | 42 | 42 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 46 | 1 | 45 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
IRAN Larger sample | 41 | 16 | 25 | 39.0% | 61.0% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 26 | 20 | 6 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
INDONESIA Medium sample | 21 | 3 | 18 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
INDIA Medium sample | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% | 57.9% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Medium sample | 17 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% | 82.4% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
AZERBAIJAN Medium sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
EGYPT Medium sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Medium sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
ARGENTINA Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
SOMALIA Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
BURMA (MYANMAR) Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
UKRAINE Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
HONDURAS Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
84
Grants
42
Denials
42
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
0
Denials
50
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
46
Grants
1
Denials
45
Grant rate: 2.2%Denial rate: 97.8%
IRAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
16
Denials
25
Grant rate: 39.0%Denial rate: 61.0%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
0
Denials
37
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
26
Grants
20
Denials
6
Grant rate: 76.9%Denial rate: 23.1%
INDONESIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
3
Denials
18
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
INDIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
8
Denials
11
Grant rate: 42.1%Denial rate: 57.9%
BANGLADESH
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
3
Denials
14
Grant rate: 17.6%Denial rate: 82.4%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
5
Denials
12
Grant rate: 29.4%Denial rate: 70.6%
AZERBAIJAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Grant rate: 58.3%Denial rate: 41.7%
EGYPT
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Grant rate: 27.3%Denial rate: 72.7%
SRI LANKA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
ARGENTINA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
SOMALIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
BURMA (MYANMAR)
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
UKRAINE
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
HONDURAS
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.