BRAZIL
Larger sampleTotal decisions
69
Grants
21
Denials
48
Grant rate: 30.4%Denial rate: 69.6%
Immigration judge
Griffiths, Nancy
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
34.4%
64 / 186
Total decisions
186
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.4%
Grants: 64
Denial rate
65.6%
Denials: 122
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants64 / 186
Denials122 / 186
Other relief0 / 186
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAZIL Larger sample | 69 | 21 | 48 | 30.4% | 69.6% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 38 | 12 | 26 | 31.6% | 68.4% | View details | |
ECUADOR Medium sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
ROMANIA Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ANGOLA Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
BELARUS Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
INDONESIA Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
PERU Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
BURUNDI Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
CAMEROON Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
CUBA Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
HAITI Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
INDIA Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
UGANDA Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
View details
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
12
Denials
26
Grant rate: 31.6%Denial rate: 68.4%
ECUADOR
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
COLOMBIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
EL SALVADOR
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
ROMANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ANGOLA
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
BELARUS
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
INDONESIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
PERU
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
BURUNDI
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
CAMEROON
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
CUBA
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
HAITI
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
INDIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
UGANDA
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
AFGHANISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Grant rate: -Denial rate: -
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.