EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
14
Denials
56
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Immigration judge
Erwin, R. Lee
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
27.2%
83 / 305
Total decisions
305
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.2%
Grants: 83
Denial rate
72.8%
Denials: 222
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants83 / 305
Denials222 / 305
Other relief0 / 305
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 70 | 14 | 56 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 60 | 27 | 33 | 45.0% | 55.0% | View details | |
CUBA Larger sample | 35 | 6 | 29 | 17.1% | 82.9% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Medium sample | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
HAITI Medium sample | 19 | 1 | 18 | 5.3% | 94.7% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
LEBANON Medium sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Small sample | 8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
CHINA Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
MEXICO Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
BULGARIA Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
JAMAICA Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
JORDAN Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
60
Grants
27
Denials
33
Grant rate: 45.0%Denial rate: 55.0%
CUBA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
6
Denials
29
Grant rate: 17.1%Denial rate: 82.9%
GUATEMALA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
2
Denials
20
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
HAITI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
1
Denials
18
Grant rate: 5.3%Denial rate: 94.7%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Grant rate: 72.7%Denial rate: 27.3%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
LEBANON
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
AFGHANISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
BANGLADESH
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
2
Denials
6
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
VENEZUELA
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
CHINA
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PHILIPPINES
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
MEXICO
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
SRI LANKA
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
BULGARIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ETHIOPIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
JAMAICA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
JORDAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.