CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
193
Grants
107
Denials
86
Grant rate: 55.4%Denial rate: 44.6%
Immigration judge
Conroy, Charles R.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
27.9%
322 / 1153
Total decisions
1153
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
27.9%
Grants: 322
Denial rate
72.1%
Denials: 831
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants322 / 1153
Denials831 / 1153
Other relief0 / 1153
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 193 | 107 | 86 | 55.4% | 44.6% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 166 | 2 | 164 | 1.2% | 98.8% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 103 | 11 | 92 | 10.7% | 89.3% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 103 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 65.0% | View details | |
ECUADOR Larger sample | 88 | 3 | 85 | 3.4% | 96.6% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 60 | 3 | 57 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Larger sample | 36 | 25 | 11 | 69.4% | 30.6% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 34 | 0 | 34 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Medium sample | 29 | 12 | 17 | 41.4% | 58.6% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 28 | 3 | 25 | 10.7% | 89.3% | View details | |
NEPAL Medium sample | 27 | 15 | 12 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Medium sample | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
TURKIYE Medium sample | 18 | 9 | 9 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
JAMAICA Medium sample | 17 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 76.5% | View details | |
ALBANIA Medium sample | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | 31.3% | View details | |
CAMEROON Medium sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Medium sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 13 | 5 | 8 | 38.5% | 61.5% | View details | |
UZBEKISTAN Medium sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
GEORGIA Medium sample | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
166
Grants
2
Denials
164
Grant rate: 1.2%Denial rate: 98.8%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
103
Grants
11
Denials
92
Grant rate: 10.7%Denial rate: 89.3%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
103
Grants
36
Denials
67
Grant rate: 35.0%Denial rate: 65.0%
ECUADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
88
Grants
3
Denials
85
Grant rate: 3.4%Denial rate: 96.6%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
60
Grants
3
Denials
57
Grant rate: 5.0%Denial rate: 95.0%
BANGLADESH
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
25
Denials
11
Grant rate: 69.4%Denial rate: 30.6%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
0
Denials
34
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
VENEZUELA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
12
Denials
17
Grant rate: 41.4%Denial rate: 58.6%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
3
Denials
25
Grant rate: 10.7%Denial rate: 89.3%
NEPAL
Medium sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
15
Denials
12
Grant rate: 55.6%Denial rate: 44.4%
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
0
Denials
20
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
TURKIYE
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
9
Denials
9
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
JAMAICA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
4
Denials
13
Grant rate: 23.5%Denial rate: 76.5%
ALBANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
11
Denials
5
Grant rate: 68.8%Denial rate: 31.3%
CAMEROON
Medium sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Grant rate: 78.6%Denial rate: 21.4%
NICARAGUA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Grant rate: 15.4%Denial rate: 84.6%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
5
Denials
8
Grant rate: 38.5%Denial rate: 61.5%
UZBEKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
GEORGIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
5
Denials
5
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.