GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
273
Grants
33
Denials
240
Grant rate: 12.1%Denial rate: 87.9%
Immigration judge
Williams, John C.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
32.2%
559 / 1737
Total decisions
1737
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
32.2%
Grants: 559
Denial rate
67.8%
Denials: 1178
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants559 / 1737
Denials1178 / 1737
Other relief0 / 1737
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 273 | 33 | 240 | 12.1% | 87.9% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 235 | 18 | 217 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
IRAQ Larger sample | 207 | 142 | 65 | 68.6% | 31.4% | View details | |
SOMALIA Larger sample | 135 | 52 | 83 | 38.5% | 61.5% | View details | |
IRAN Larger sample | 102 | 73 | 29 | 71.6% | 28.4% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 89 | 7 | 82 | 7.9% | 92.1% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 86 | 19 | 67 | 22.1% | 77.9% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 85 | 55 | 30 | 64.7% | 35.3% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Larger sample | 67 | 3 | 64 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 61 | 8 | 53 | 13.1% | 86.9% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 28 | 18 | 10 | 64.3% | 35.7% | View details | |
LAOS Medium sample | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 86.4% | View details | |
ARMENIA Medium sample | 21 | 10 | 11 | 47.6% | 52.4% | View details | |
VIETNAM Medium sample | 21 | 1 | 20 | 4.8% | 95.2% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
Former Countries Medium sample | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Medium sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Medium sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
EGYPT Medium sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
235
Grants
18
Denials
217
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
IRAQ
Larger sampleTotal decisions
207
Grants
142
Denials
65
Grant rate: 68.6%Denial rate: 31.4%
SOMALIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
135
Grants
52
Denials
83
Grant rate: 38.5%Denial rate: 61.5%
IRAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
73
Denials
29
Grant rate: 71.6%Denial rate: 28.4%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
89
Grants
7
Denials
82
Grant rate: 7.9%Denial rate: 92.1%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
86
Grants
19
Denials
67
Grant rate: 22.1%Denial rate: 77.9%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
85
Grants
55
Denials
30
Grant rate: 64.7%Denial rate: 35.3%
PHILIPPINES
Larger sampleTotal decisions
67
Grants
3
Denials
64
Grant rate: 4.5%Denial rate: 95.5%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
61
Grants
8
Denials
53
Grant rate: 13.1%Denial rate: 86.9%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
18
Denials
10
Grant rate: 64.3%Denial rate: 35.7%
LAOS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
3
Denials
19
Grant rate: 13.6%Denial rate: 86.4%
ARMENIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
10
Denials
11
Grant rate: 47.6%Denial rate: 52.4%
VIETNAM
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
1
Denials
20
Grant rate: 4.8%Denial rate: 95.2%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
1
Denials
15
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
Former Countries
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
4
Denials
12
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
SRI LANKA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
AFGHANISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Grant rate: 46.2%Denial rate: 53.8%
EGYPT
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.