CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
808
Grants
52
Denials
756
Grant rate: 6.4%Denial rate: 93.6%
Immigration judge
Speer, John K.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
21.0%
458 / 2178
Total decisions
2178
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
21.0%
Grants: 458
Denial rate
79.0%
Denials: 1720
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants458 / 2178
Denials1720 / 2178
Other relief0 / 2178
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 808 | 52 | 756 | 6.4% | 93.6% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Larger sample | 259 | 216 | 43 | 83.4% | 16.6% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 203 | 5 | 198 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 135 | 7 | 128 | 5.2% | 94.8% | View details | |
Former Countries Larger sample | 102 | 44 | 58 | 43.1% | 56.9% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Larger sample | 98 | 6 | 92 | 6.1% | 93.9% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Larger sample | 62 | 1 | 61 | 1.6% | 98.4% | View details | |
MAURITANIA Larger sample | 49 | 5 | 44 | 10.2% | 89.8% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 45 | 5 | 40 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
GHANA Larger sample | 41 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 73.2% | View details | |
HAITI Medium sample | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Medium sample | 27 | 1 | 26 | 3.7% | 96.3% | View details | |
NO NATIONALITY Medium sample | 21 | 10 | 11 | 47.6% | 52.4% | View details | |
ALBANIA Medium sample | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
POLAND Medium sample | 18 | 4 | 14 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 17 | 10 | 7 | 58.8% | 41.2% | View details | |
LEBANON Medium sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
UKRAINE Medium sample | 13 | 7 | 6 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
AFGHANISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
259
Grants
216
Denials
43
Grant rate: 83.4%Denial rate: 16.6%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
203
Grants
5
Denials
198
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
135
Grants
7
Denials
128
Grant rate: 5.2%Denial rate: 94.8%
Former Countries
Larger sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
44
Denials
58
Grant rate: 43.1%Denial rate: 56.9%
PAKISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
98
Grants
6
Denials
92
Grant rate: 6.1%Denial rate: 93.9%
BANGLADESH
Larger sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
1
Denials
61
Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%
MAURITANIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
5
Denials
44
Grant rate: 10.2%Denial rate: 89.8%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
5
Denials
40
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
GHANA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
11
Denials
30
Grant rate: 26.8%Denial rate: 73.2%
HAITI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
0
Denials
29
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
GUATEMALA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
1
Denials
26
Grant rate: 3.7%Denial rate: 96.3%
NO NATIONALITY
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
10
Denials
11
Grant rate: 47.6%Denial rate: 52.4%
ALBANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
6
Denials
14
Grant rate: 30.0%Denial rate: 70.0%
POLAND
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
4
Denials
14
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
10
Denials
7
Grant rate: 58.8%Denial rate: 41.2%
LEBANON
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Grant rate: 61.5%Denial rate: 38.5%
UKRAINE
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
7
Denials
6
Grant rate: 53.8%Denial rate: 46.2%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.