Former Countries
Larger sampleTotal decisions
74
Grants
11
Denials
63
Grant rate: 14.9%Denial rate: 85.1%
Immigration judge
Pullen, Thomas L.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
22.3%
76 / 341
Total decisions
341
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
22.3%
Grants: 76
Denial rate
77.7%
Denials: 265
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants76 / 341
Denials265 / 341
Other relief0 / 341
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Former Countries Larger sample | 74 | 11 | 63 | 14.9% | 85.1% | View details | |
POLAND Larger sample | 48 | 12 | 36 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
CUBA Larger sample | 34 | 0 | 34 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
IRAQ Larger sample | 32 | 2 | 30 | 6.3% | 93.8% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43.5% | 56.5% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
PORTUGAL Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
INDIA Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
LEBANON Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
LIBERIA Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
ROMANIA Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
CHINA Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
GHANA Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
JORDAN Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
POLAND
Larger sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
12
Denials
36
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
5
Denials
30
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
CUBA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
0
Denials
34
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
IRAQ
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
2
Denials
30
Grant rate: 6.3%Denial rate: 93.8%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
10
Denials
13
Grant rate: 43.5%Denial rate: 56.5%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Grant rate: 27.3%Denial rate: 72.7%
GUATEMALA
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
NICARAGUA
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
PORTUGAL
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
INDIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
LEBANON
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
LIBERIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
AFGHANISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
ROMANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
CHINA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
GHANA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
HONDURAS
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
JORDAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.