CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
136
Grants
63
Denials
73
Grant rate: 46.3%Denial rate: 53.7%
Immigration judge
Hollis, Wendell A.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
28.0%
190 / 679
Total decisions
679
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
28.0%
Grants: 190
Denial rate
72.0%
Denials: 489
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants190 / 679
Denials489 / 679
Other relief0 / 679
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 136 | 63 | 73 | 46.3% | 53.7% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 79 | 2 | 77 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 77 | 4 | 73 | 5.2% | 94.8% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 54 | 7 | 47 | 13.0% | 87.0% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 32 | 4 | 28 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
BULGARIA Medium sample | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48.3% | 51.7% | View details | |
FIJI Medium sample | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
ROMANIA Medium sample | 20 | 13 | 7 | 65.0% | 35.0% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
INDONESIA Medium sample | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 76.9% | View details | |
ARMENIA Medium sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 12 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 58.3% | View details | |
ALBANIA Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
ZIMBABWE Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
LEBANON Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
PERU Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
CUBA Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
View details
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
79
Grants
2
Denials
77
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
77
Grants
4
Denials
73
Grant rate: 5.2%Denial rate: 94.8%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
54
Grants
7
Denials
47
Grant rate: 13.0%Denial rate: 87.0%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
4
Denials
28
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
BULGARIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
14
Denials
15
Grant rate: 48.3%Denial rate: 51.7%
FIJI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
10
Denials
14
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
ROMANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
13
Denials
7
Grant rate: 65.0%Denial rate: 35.0%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
3
Denials
12
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
INDONESIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
3
Denials
10
Grant rate: 23.1%Denial rate: 76.9%
ARMENIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
5
Denials
7
Grant rate: 41.7%Denial rate: 58.3%
ALBANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
COLOMBIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PHILIPPINES
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
ZIMBABWE
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
LEBANON
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
PERU
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
CUBA
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.