CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
209
Grants
122
Denials
87
Grant rate: 58.4%Denial rate: 41.6%
Immigration judge
Grussendorf, Paul
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
59.6%
515 / 864
Total decisions
864
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
59.6%
Grants: 515
Denial rate
40.4%
Denials: 349
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants515 / 864
Denials349 / 864
Other relief0 / 864
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 209 | 122 | 87 | 58.4% | 41.6% | View details | |
LIBERIA Larger sample | 58 | 43 | 15 | 74.1% | 25.9% | View details | |
RUSSIA Larger sample | 55 | 50 | 5 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 51 | 8 | 43 | 15.7% | 84.3% | View details | |
ALBANIA Larger sample | 44 | 30 | 14 | 68.2% | 31.8% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Larger sample | 39 | 38 | 1 | 97.4% | 2.6% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 36 | 10 | 26 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Larger sample | 32 | 21 | 11 | 65.6% | 34.4% | View details | |
ARMENIA Medium sample | 18 | 7 | 11 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
INDONESIA Medium sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Medium sample | 13 | 10 | 3 | 76.9% | 23.1% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Medium sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
EGYPT Medium sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
KAMPUCHEA Medium sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
ROMANIA Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
UKRAINE Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details |
View details
LIBERIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
58
Grants
43
Denials
15
Grant rate: 74.1%Denial rate: 25.9%
RUSSIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
50
Denials
5
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
8
Denials
43
Grant rate: 15.7%Denial rate: 84.3%
ALBANIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
30
Denials
14
Grant rate: 68.2%Denial rate: 31.8%
SRI LANKA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
38
Denials
1
Grant rate: 97.4%Denial rate: 2.6%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
10
Denials
26
Grant rate: 27.8%Denial rate: 72.2%
PAKISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
21
Denials
11
Grant rate: 65.6%Denial rate: 34.4%
ARMENIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
7
Denials
11
Grant rate: 38.9%Denial rate: 61.1%
INDONESIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Grant rate: 53.3%Denial rate: 46.7%
AFGHANISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
10
Denials
3
Grant rate: 76.9%Denial rate: 23.1%
EL SALVADOR
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
EGYPT
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
KAMPUCHEA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
COLOMBIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
ETHIOPIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
ROMANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
UKRAINE
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.