CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
446
Grants
208
Denials
238
Grant rate: 46.6%Denial rate: 53.4%
Immigration judge
Dunkel-Bradley, Dorothy
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
34.8%
673 / 1933
Total decisions
1933
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.8%
Grants: 673
Denial rate
65.2%
Denials: 1260
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants673 / 1933
Denials1260 / 1933
Other relief0 / 1933
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 446 | 208 | 238 | 46.6% | 53.4% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 221 | 21 | 200 | 9.5% | 90.5% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 203 | 10 | 193 | 4.9% | 95.1% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 187 | 98 | 89 | 52.4% | 47.6% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 165 | 10 | 155 | 6.1% | 93.9% | View details | |
INDONESIA Larger sample | 129 | 43 | 86 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
IRAN Larger sample | 104 | 56 | 48 | 53.8% | 46.2% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 36 | 10 | 26 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
EGYPT Larger sample | 35 | 26 | 9 | 74.3% | 25.7% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Medium sample | 29 | 12 | 17 | 41.4% | 58.6% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Medium sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
IRAQ Medium sample | 17 | 8 | 9 | 47.1% | 52.9% | View details | |
BURMA (MYANMAR) Medium sample | 16 | 10 | 6 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 16 | 8 | 8 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% | 81.3% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 15 | 11 | 4 | 73.3% | 26.7% | View details | |
SOMALIA Medium sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Medium sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details |
View details
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
221
Grants
21
Denials
200
Grant rate: 9.5%Denial rate: 90.5%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
203
Grants
10
Denials
193
Grant rate: 4.9%Denial rate: 95.1%
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
187
Grants
98
Denials
89
Grant rate: 52.4%Denial rate: 47.6%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
165
Grants
10
Denials
155
Grant rate: 6.1%Denial rate: 93.9%
INDONESIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
129
Grants
43
Denials
86
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
IRAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
56
Denials
48
Grant rate: 53.8%Denial rate: 46.2%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
19
Denials
19
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
10
Denials
26
Grant rate: 27.8%Denial rate: 72.2%
EGYPT
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
26
Denials
9
Grant rate: 74.3%Denial rate: 25.7%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
5
Denials
30
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
BANGLADESH
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
12
Denials
17
Grant rate: 41.4%Denial rate: 58.6%
PAKISTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
IRAQ
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
8
Denials
9
Grant rate: 47.1%Denial rate: 52.9%
BURMA (MYANMAR)
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
10
Denials
6
Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
8
Denials
8
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
3
Denials
13
Grant rate: 18.8%Denial rate: 81.3%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
11
Denials
4
Grant rate: 73.3%Denial rate: 26.7%
SOMALIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Grant rate: 58.3%Denial rate: 41.7%
NICARAGUA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.