Michael C. Mc Goings
This court
Total Decisions
17
Asylum Grant Rate
35.3%
Denials
64.7%
Other Relief Rate
0.0%
Moderate sample
Data updated: Jul 8, 2026
← Back to all courts
Immigration Court
Aga Immigration Court
सामुदायिक चर्चा · 01 judges · GU
- City / state
- Immigration Court, GU
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Average Asylum Grant Rate
42.6%
576 / 1353
Average Asylum Grant Rate
42.6%
Asylum grants
576
Denials
777
Judges indexed
1
Aga Immigration Court has 1 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
समुदाय का दृष्टिकोण
सामुदायिक चर्चा
Aga Immigration Court से संबंधित सार्वजनिक अनुभव और प्रक्रिया की चर्चा पढ़ें।
0 विषय
आप इन सार्वजनिक विषयों से शुरुआत कर सकते हैं
- सार्वजनिक प्रक्रिया या तैयारी का अनुभव साझा करें
- सार्वजनिक डेटा को समझने पर चर्चा करें
- व्यक्तिगत केस विवरण के बिना प्रश्न पूछें
Judges indexed for this court
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 42.5% | 470 | 637 | 1107 |
| Russia | 50.3% | 72 | 71 | 143 |
| FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 21 | 21 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 94.4% | 17 | 1 | 18 |
| PHILIPPINES | 16.7% | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| SRI LANKA | 22.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Ghana | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| MALAYSIA | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| India | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Vietnam | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| HONG KONG | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| TAIWAN | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cameroon | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Bangladesh | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CANADA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iran | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Iraq | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nigeria | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pakistan | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| RWANDA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SOUTH KOREA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| THAILAND | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.