INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
754
Grants
306
Denials
448
Grant rate: 40.6%Denial rate: 59.4%
Immigration judge
Webber, Polly A.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
52.3%
1426 / 2728
Total decisions
2728
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
52.3%
Grants: 1426
Denial rate
47.7%
Denials: 1302
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants1426 / 2728
Denials1302 / 2728
Other relief0 / 2728
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDIA Larger sample | 754 | 306 | 448 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 246 | 155 | 91 | 63.0% | 37.0% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 231 | 147 | 84 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 205 | 72 | 133 | 35.1% | 64.9% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 183 | 60 | 123 | 32.8% | 67.2% | View details | |
NEPAL Larger sample | 79 | 53 | 26 | 67.1% | 32.9% | View details | |
FIJI Larger sample | 76 | 37 | 39 | 48.7% | 51.3% | View details | |
INDONESIA Larger sample | 74 | 25 | 49 | 33.8% | 66.2% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Larger sample | 64 | 9 | 55 | 14.1% | 85.9% | View details | |
ERITREA Larger sample | 58 | 52 | 6 | 89.7% | 10.3% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 52 | 27 | 25 | 51.9% | 48.1% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 47 | 22 | 25 | 46.8% | 53.2% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Larger sample | 45 | 41 | 4 | 91.1% | 8.9% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 45 | 36 | 9 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Larger sample | 39 | 26 | 13 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
MONGOLIA Larger sample | 36 | 18 | 18 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
BRAZIL Larger sample | 32 | 15 | 17 | 46.9% | 53.1% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Larger sample | 32 | 13 | 19 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
ROMANIA Medium sample | 28 | 23 | 5 | 82.1% | 17.9% | View details | |
SOMALIA Medium sample | 28 | 23 | 5 | 82.1% | 17.9% | View details |
View details
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
246
Grants
155
Denials
91
Grant rate: 63.0%Denial rate: 37.0%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
231
Grants
147
Denials
84
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
205
Grants
72
Denials
133
Grant rate: 35.1%Denial rate: 64.9%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
183
Grants
60
Denials
123
Grant rate: 32.8%Denial rate: 67.2%
NEPAL
Larger sampleTotal decisions
79
Grants
53
Denials
26
Grant rate: 67.1%Denial rate: 32.9%
FIJI
Larger sampleTotal decisions
76
Grants
37
Denials
39
Grant rate: 48.7%Denial rate: 51.3%
INDONESIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
74
Grants
25
Denials
49
Grant rate: 33.8%Denial rate: 66.2%
PHILIPPINES
Larger sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
9
Denials
55
Grant rate: 14.1%Denial rate: 85.9%
ERITREA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
58
Grants
52
Denials
6
Grant rate: 89.7%Denial rate: 10.3%
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
52
Grants
27
Denials
25
Grant rate: 51.9%Denial rate: 48.1%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
22
Denials
25
Grant rate: 46.8%Denial rate: 53.2%
ETHIOPIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
41
Denials
4
Grant rate: 91.1%Denial rate: 8.9%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
36
Denials
9
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
RUSSIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
26
Denials
13
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
MONGOLIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
18
Denials
18
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
BRAZIL
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
15
Denials
17
Grant rate: 46.9%Denial rate: 53.1%
PAKISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
13
Denials
19
Grant rate: 40.6%Denial rate: 59.4%
ROMANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
23
Denials
5
Grant rate: 82.1%Denial rate: 17.9%
SOMALIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
23
Denials
5
Grant rate: 82.1%Denial rate: 17.9%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.