EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
642
Grants
229
Denials
413
Grant rate: 35.7%Denial rate: 64.3%
Immigration judge
Vargas-Padilla, Nelson A.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
36.7%
641 / 1745
Total decisions
1745
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
36.7%
Grants: 641
Denial rate
63.3%
Denials: 1104
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants641 / 1745
Denials1104 / 1745
Other relief0 / 1745
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 642 | 229 | 413 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 350 | 112 | 238 | 32.0% | 68.0% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 210 | 54 | 156 | 25.7% | 74.3% | View details | |
CAMEROON Larger sample | 74 | 50 | 24 | 67.6% | 32.4% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 70 | 39 | 31 | 55.7% | 44.3% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 34 | 2 | 32 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
NIGERIA Larger sample | 30 | 14 | 16 | 46.7% | 53.3% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Medium sample | 29 | 18 | 11 | 62.1% | 37.9% | View details | |
ROMANIA Medium sample | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
ECUADOR Medium sample | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
HAITI Medium sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
INDIA Medium sample | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
CHINA Medium sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
UGANDA Medium sample | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
BRAZIL Medium sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Small sample | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
RUSSIA Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details |
View details
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
350
Grants
112
Denials
238
Grant rate: 32.0%Denial rate: 68.0%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
210
Grants
54
Denials
156
Grant rate: 25.7%Denial rate: 74.3%
CAMEROON
Larger sampleTotal decisions
74
Grants
50
Denials
24
Grant rate: 67.6%Denial rate: 32.4%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
39
Denials
31
Grant rate: 55.7%Denial rate: 44.3%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
2
Denials
32
Grant rate: 5.9%Denial rate: 94.1%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
6
Denials
24
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
NIGERIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
14
Denials
16
Grant rate: 46.7%Denial rate: 53.3%
VENEZUELA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
18
Denials
11
Grant rate: 62.1%Denial rate: 37.9%
ROMANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
0
Denials
27
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
15
Denials
3
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
ECUADOR
Medium sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
2
Denials
14
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
HAITI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
INDIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
6
Denials
9
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
CHINA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
UGANDA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
6
Denials
6
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
BRAZIL
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
BANGLADESH
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
4
Denials
5
Grant rate: 44.4%Denial rate: 55.6%
RUSSIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.